<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nefarious Narratives in the Catholic Abortion Conflict</title>
	<atom:link href="http://religiousrhetorics.com/2009/06/08/nefarious-narratives/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://religiousrhetorics.com/2009/06/08/nefarious-narratives/</link>
	<description>Rhetorical analysis of American religion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 19:28:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie Draper</title>
		<link>http://religiousrhetorics.com/2009/06/08/nefarious-narratives/#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Julie Draper]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 18:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://religiousrhetorics.com/?p=334#comment-71</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kari,

Thanks for another even-handed post in the ever volatile realm of abortion rhetoric. I also appreciated the link you included to the Cristina Page piece and was wondering if you could elaborate on the master narrative you see at work there. I think I see it, but I&#039;m not sure. Is it that pro-lifers should expand their vision of what it means to be pro-life, such that they pursue justice in broader terms and thereby ultimately realize the goal of lowering the number/need for abortions? And that pro-choicers should similarly realize their shared interest in justice? And thus the two groups can work together? I would be interested in any expounding you might be able to do on this in connection with your post.

Thanks!
Julie]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kari,</p>
<p>Thanks for another even-handed post in the ever volatile realm of abortion rhetoric. I also appreciated the link you included to the Cristina Page piece and was wondering if you could elaborate on the master narrative you see at work there. I think I see it, but I&#8217;m not sure. Is it that pro-lifers should expand their vision of what it means to be pro-life, such that they pursue justice in broader terms and thereby ultimately realize the goal of lowering the number/need for abortions? And that pro-choicers should similarly realize their shared interest in justice? And thus the two groups can work together? I would be interested in any expounding you might be able to do on this in connection with your post.</p>
<p>Thanks!<br />
Julie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

